« Satisfaction hosts Customer Service Summit on Feb. 4 in SF | Main | Burst.com patents DVR time-shifting »

December 18, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cdafd53ef00e54fbcd8d98834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Should Yahoo! be able to patent "smart drag and drop"? How you can help the US Patent Office reject a bogus patent claim:

Comments

Gabe Wachob

Wouldn't it be cool if *every* software patent was subject to this sort of review? That is, required by statute...

zoobab

Fighting for good quality software patents is silly.

Subject matter exclusion is the solution.

PtP does not have the right incentives.

Jason Schultz

@zoobab - I disagree. While there are certainly good reasons to fight to exclude software as patentable subject matter, we can't ignore the reality that these patents are being granted every day and affecting innovators all across the technology spectrum. Plus, it doesn't take much effort (if you know of prior art) to post it on PtP, so the investment is pretty low and the outcome real and significant. In other words, there's no reason we can't fight the war on both fronts, IMO.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

June 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Support EFF

  • Support EFF
    EFF v. AT&T

TechGeeks

License