« Great Video Critique of Repubilcan Scare Tactics | Main | Silly Software Patent #22: Command Line Macros »

October 26, 2004

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cdafd53ef00d83421d00953ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Static Control Wins DMCA Reversal!:

» Ink, Inc. from ***Dave Does the Blog
W00T. Overriding the "lock" on the software on an ink cartridge (for purposes of replacing it at a price somewhat less than the exhorbitant amount that the original manufacturer wants... [Read More]

» Printers and the DMCA don't mix... from Extemporaneous Mumblings
[Read More]

» Inkjet Cartridge DMCA Ruling Overturned from The Future of Television
Jason Schultz writes, "This just in --- Static Control Corp. has won its appeal against Lexmark over the right to produce after-market replacement cartridges for Lexmark printers." First the Induce Act was killed (at least for now), now the DMCA... [Read More]

» DMCA Reversal in Printer Cartridge Case from Timothy K. Armstrong
Just days after covering the Lexmark case in John [Read More]

» DMCA Ruling Reversal In Lexmark v. Static Control from LinkBlog
Static Control Wins DMCA Reversal! Another score against companies abusing bad law. The first comment does bring up some concern, though.... [Read More]

» Consommateurs 1, Lexmark 0 from Blog Cafe
Les consommateurs pourraient être les grands gagnants du jugement dans la cause opposant Lexmark à Static Control Components. [Read More]

» More Copyright insanity from Self Conscious White Noise
This is just crazy... A printer company is using the DMCA to prevent people from using discount cartridges by claiming that each cartridge is a copyrighted work...... [Read More]

» Good Ol' DCMA from Loomware - Crafting New Libraries
I thought I heard it all with attempts to twist the twisted DMCA to ludicrous ends, but I was wrong. LawGeek reported that Lexmark has lost a lawsuit designed to prevent a company from filling empty inkjet cartridges. Lexmark claimed you have to crack ... [Read More]

» Printers and the DMCA don't mix... from Extemporaneous Mumblings
[Read More]

Comments

Joe Buck

Interesting. As I read the legal reasoning, it seems to say that if you use a cryptographic hash (MD5 or SHA-1 or the like) of your whole program as a lockout key, that makes every byte of your program functional rather than expressive, and grants others the right to copy the whole thing for compatibility purposes, no matter how big it is. I'm concerned that the higher courts might not want to go that far.

Karl

AOL already does something similar with its OSCAR protocol. The servers send a request for the hash of a range of bytes in the AIM exe. The only way for you to get past that is to have the full executable itself. More information can be found at http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cache:w6bpd_PzNiMJ:iserverd1.khstu.ru/oscar/sequences.html&hl=en#verification (using the Google cache because the actual site is extremely slow).

Sega also used IP to protect its systems from unlicensed games. In version 2+ of the Genesis, licensed games had to have the string "SEGA" at a certain location in ROM. That string would trigger the message, "Produced by or under license from Sega Enterprises." So, you had to use Sega's trademark (AND claim that your product was licensed by Sega!) for your game to run. This was shot down by the courts. (Sega v Accolade, http://www.law.seattleu.edu/fachome/chonm/Cases/sega.html) Later Sega systems actually require a whole program (copied verbatim) to be on the disc, which displays a similar message.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

My Photo

June 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Support EFF

  • Support EFF
    EFF v. AT&T

TechGeeks

License